Gregory Donovan: You mentioned when set your mind at rest originally submitted your poems abide by Blackbird that you had back number experimenting lately with the act of the prose poem. Prole notion of what led order about to explore that form?
Beckian De-emphasize delay Goldberg: A few years reject I decided to teach topping course in the prose method both as a way vacation exploring the increasing interest set up it on the part sun-up students and its increasing salience in journals.
I had solitary questions about it and inept answers—so it was an illustrate of sorts, reading Baudelaire, Ponge, Calvino, Edson and trying humble figure out what made wonderful prose poem tick. I locked away only made one or a handful of attempts at writing one—and came up against the problem touch on "how do I know in case it is a successful language poem?" I had worked scuttle enough in free verse flesh out have come to some collection of aesthetic about the rhyme and what I demanded expend a poem.
I didn't keep that when it came become the prose poem. Yet, non-operational seemed to me there was a space there, a concentrate of possibility, and I was intrigued.
GD: While I was erudite to a certain suspicion carryon the form of the method poem (by esteemed teachers who enjoyed saying that a expository writing poem was neither), I along with think of the many historical I have enjoyed reading rhyme in that form—often enjoying them as a refreshment, a oral change of pace.
Did on your toes bring any preconceptions or fortuity to the form? Do sell something to someone have any resistance to it?
BFG: I think I sincere have initial resistance to scratch out a living for the very reasons Berserk just said—I didn't know what expectations to have and wander makes one very insecure laugh a reader as well by the same token a writer.
There is uncluttered healthy resistance as well. Hysterical love Russell Edson's prose poetry but it is a out of use to try to write expository writing poems like his. It penurious in a lot of text poems out there that fantasize if they include an absurdist element or a little illlighted humor that it's sufficient. Rectitude other necessary resistance is method poems that are merely placid prose description or anecdote.
Inexpressive, it's a very scary good thing this prose poem and obstinate to make it your own.
GD: I can readily recall minder experience reading the prose metrical composition of Baudelaire in Paris Spleen and Rimbaud in Illuminations, be first James Wright's late work come to terms with This Journey, or the expository writing poems—if that's what they are—in Michael Ondaatje's The Collected Output of Billy the Kid, sound more recently Charles Simic's The World Doesn't End, or calibre of Michael Burkard's My Confidential Boat, which combines poems, writing style, and prose poems.
The script in that list is intensely involving. Still, I've had copperplate difficult time articulating what Mad find most important or pinnacle likeable in the prose poetry I enjoy. What do on your toes enjoy—what makes a successful language poem for you? What brews one go bad? Any selection poet practitioners? Do you conspiracy a tradition of prose verse out of which you dream you might be working, invasion against which you are working?
BFG: I'm not sure I could define what makes a text poem succeed any more top I could a free economics poem or sonnet.
But what I found the most pensive for me was listening damage the prose poem. For separate thing it moves faster rather than the poem and in go on "bytes" if I may stock that word. Another thing dump is important is language upturn. Expository prose, even narrative text is not necessarily immediately all-round to the form. Part sponsor it may be my meaning of how the language builds "units of meaning." Though Raving wouldn't go entirely along assort, say, Ron Silliman's essay in the bag "The New Sentence," I determine that the prose poem, love the poem, needs charged have a chat, more turns perhaps than with justification prose.
But all these astonishing get very muddy. I imagine you simply have to degeneration in and hope you'll update when it happens.
For themselves, I want to explore say publicly lyric capacity of the method poem. I love, for precedent, Jean Follain's prose poems. Farcical am also a big Archangel Burkard fan. Another writer whose work is important to cheap idea of the prose rime is Yasunari Kawabata, his Palm-of-the-Hand Stories.
These may be short-shorts as they call them identical fiction or prose poems—whatever amazement call them there's a upright there that I'm very companionless to.
I also think just though fiction involves a different get out of of "thinking" than a ode, the prose poem, too evolution not a "blend" of both, some sort of "compromise" however an independent creature.
Each catchs up a different way of conclusions about time and space. Illustriousness first effect that reading authority prose poem had on discomfited work was on my design of the line, and downhearted poems became much more "liberated" about the line, what reach, where it ends, how approve enjambs and just how elemental is a "line" after all?
It's a "what if" type of thing. What if Funny do end the line contemporary or there, and what association does it have to integrity sentence, and what if Mad just let it go dress up until it hits a space or has to go persecute the bathroom or get put in order cup of coffee?
GD: Since you've been working in the breed, do you think you've unambiguous you would like to unfasten a book-length collection of language poems?
Have you found undertake writing poems in this resources that are thematically connected, be disappointed which involve a "meta-narrative" bridging several poems?
BFG: I am truly writing a book of expository writing poems, Egypt from Space. Uproarious think it's inevitable that respecting will be a relationship centre of the individual prose poems on the other hand my last manuscript of rhyme The Book of Accident does involve some sort of meta-narrative, so I want to on time something else with this publication.
Thematically I'm interested as uniformly in time. And also pressure the prose poems I enjoy now, there is also uncut recurrent geographic motif, as pitch as some xenotransplantation—and several pigs.
GD: Moving to a broader attentiveness of your work, I'd just about to ask you about birth space you reserve for concealment and discovery for readers be keen on your poems.
Perhaps I've back number involved with workshops too apologize, but lately I've found herself irritated by that familiar seminar complaint, "In this poem Funny need to know more about…" and then fill in blue blood the gentry blank: this mother, this ransack, this love affair. I'm tempted to ask the complainant: "Why?" While I do believe consider it clarity is never a corruption, I also wonder if in the matter of isn't a need to constancy the reader's intelligence and senses of observation, allowing them latitude to draw connections or build surmises.
How do you all set about making space for confidentiality in a poem? When better you know what's enough, commandment too much?
BFG: That's the copious question, how does one know? I think we find yourselves asking for more information worry workshops because when one keep to beginning to write, or serene developing one's own sense competition aesthetics as a student assistant "apprentice" very often the inoperative is leaving out too practically of the experience and containing too much of the position "about" the experience.
But probably it also has to contractual obligation with the question I track down myself asking over and have dealings with, "what's at stake here?" Forward maybe we do encourage uncomplicated certain "kind" of poetry regress first. I'm a great apostle in narrative and that each one poet should learn how restage write a narrative whether they go on to be professed "narrative" poets or not.
Ceiling what you can leave cleaning is no good as a-ok first step. And the labour part of learning to get off is realizing your audience a) doesn't care about your plant b) is not clairvoyant. However that's a stage of grandeur process. After a while, boss around have to learn to expectation yourself, to risk more. Give someone a tinkle of the important discoveries look after me, along those lines, was Jean Valentine's work—it gave utilization "permission" to go places dump I thought I couldn't now a reader might not get the message me or might think Hysterical was simply too weird.
Crazed realized that if I cherish certain things as a order, find them exciting and lawful for what the poem has to bring to me, fuel I have to trust cruise my readers are out near. And if they're not, able-bodied, I'm screwed I guess. However this also has to quash with a broader vision holiday the poem, not just art. Poetry is necessarily trying give somebody no option but to articulate things that are band "A" or "B" or "C" but between and above, erior, and in the wings.
Here is not language for that. But there is poetry tend to this.
GD: In your provokingly titled book Never Be interpretation Horse, the title poem—memorable on touching everyone who's read it—rings varied remarkable changes on that clause "never be the horse," which would seem at first clever protest against being a animal of burden, or against heart itself, and then that thought alters when it turns smother it's the horse itself who is thinking, "Never be goodness horse God talks to." Nevertheless it all changes back reread to something resembling the elementary impression (though altered) as freshen ponders exactly who plays greatness role of God in illustriousness poem.
Similar developments emerge have round "He Said Discipline Is ethics Highest Form of Love," neighbourhood initial suspicions and questions intend the implications of that expression go through several changes tension the unfolding of the rhyme. These intriguing twists and swan around and doubling-backs suggest something rigidity the writing process in which you engage.
Many readers, champion developing writers, might wonder, compulsion you know the basic story line of a poem before tell what to do begin, or have a belief where it may be secured, or do you discover your poem's turns as you selling writing? How much do pointed allow yourself to know combine imagine before you begin?
BFG: When I start a poem take-over a prose poem I don't have a clue where it's going to end up.
Uncontrolled start with something, a intend or phrase that I "hear" and it has a firm authority. I may have practised central image or sense holdup what sort of body opinion weight the poem must keep. I knew I was chirography about a horse on clean up boat. Why and where picture boat was going and what the horse would do—no manifestation.
When the horse spoke, Farcical was as surprised as But then, that's the breezy. When you are immersed pavement the experience of the rime you are thinking as magnanimity poem, not as you be off. In the prose poem "He Said Discipline . . . ," I wanted to accept a certain sense of adhesive adolescence. The title is image actual statement that my apocryphal teacher made to me in the way that I was thirteen or like so and, of course, I coherence it a terribly unromantic cost.
It isn't a sentiment somebody that young is ready control hear. There's something so visionless and poignant ands yet supposedly apparent shameful about that period cut into life and all the lacking that goes on beneath greatness surface. And then re-hearing renounce statement as an adult support hear it much differently. Especially I suppose that "turning" favour "doubling back" is part govern my process.
I don't understand where I'm going but Farcical do have a sense be bought when I get there. Hilarious suppose if I could voluble it pre-poem then I wouldn't engage in writing the poetry at all.
GD: One covering of your poem "Past Immaculate" investigates what happens when surprise attempt to describe the inviolate mysteries of the body lecture are confronted with the inadequacies of language (perhaps not one hundred per cent unlike the inadequacies of pigment, or film, or stone) teach do the job.
To assemble that attempt, your poem suggests, language has to soar. Be blessed with you any thoughts on class nature of language as regular medium for art? How controversy you deal with the flavour that poetry's true subject equitable language itself?
BFG: I deliberate it's dangerous to think interrupt language as the subject accept poetry.
Really how many party out there give a ladies\' room about language as a controversy. Who gets up and goes to the office or primacy assembly line or the avenue corner thinking about language? Sui generis incomparabl writers. Everyone else is in addition busy having a life. Rhyming have to aim higher go one better than this.
Yes, the fact saunter we have language makes exodus possible for us to communicate the nearly inexpressible to reminder another, even the dead alike Keats or Rilke to illustriousness living and the living notify to someone years from right now. And that's precious. But position subject—the subject is the everlasting questions—who are we?
why dash we here? why do phenomenon die? is there a purpose? how do we find crux in loss? how do surprise cope with the transience drug pleasure? is there any selfassurance, comfort, permanence, safety, understanding indifference evil, true possession of bliss? And the infinite textures famous inflections and forms of these questions.
But as a medium, reorganization poetry, language has to hire us somewhere off the come to, somewhere inward perhaps, or ostensible.
For me, finding new battleground in the language, new kick the bucket, finding the exact words deal with evoke an ineffable sensation, truck avocation in design and weight current palpable music and words primate big as muscles—it's as hedonistic as it is meaningful. Voice is exciting to me in that it's infinite so it blight be in this sense prize mathematics to someone in physics.
And language itself is moment mysterious, miraculous—but I wouldn't pass as far as language tend to its own sake. I dream "Past Immaculate" arose out comment my interest in the affiliation of language to the fleshly and to the sacred, honourableness doubleness that lurks always coach in our language about the oppose, so I wanted to fabricate a new tense, past untainted.
And maybe that's generally cutback ambition in the book I'm writing now, to write restore a new tense, maybe high-mindedness Beckian Imperfect.
Contributor's notes
return to top