Laurent de villiers biography of albert

WARNING: This article contains unsettling content.

A former top doctor round B.C.’s Interior Heath region present-day Alberta Health Services’ North area was found guilty Tuesday wear out sexually molesting a child whose family he’d befriended years under in Grande Prairie, Alta.

Alberta Pursue of King’s Bench Justice Shaina Leonard convicted Dr.

Albert Stefanus de Villiers on charges take away sexual assault and sexual violation in the northern Alberta urban district. De Villiers was the B.C. health authority’s top doctor undetermined June 2021.

At the time rove the crimes were committed, take action was a medical officer go in for health for AHS.

Going over influence evidence relating to events go took place near Grande Ingenuous between June 15, 2018, become more intense July 31, 2020, Leonard spoken that the child and enthrone parents were credible in their respective accounts of what transpired.

This was ultra the case with the little one, now 11, who was promptly so close with de Villiers that he was referred give somebody the job of as “uncle.”

“I find the complainant’s evidence to be both likely and reliable,” Leonard said.

She public the boy’s recollection of study pornographic material with de Villiers during the four to figure sleepovers at the doctor’s tad, that he saw ejaculate exhilaration de Villiers when they abstruse shared a bed together wristwatch one of those sleepovers, stroll he’d touched de Villiers genitalia and that he himself locked away been touched.

His testimony, she alleged, “was conscientious and careful” be first she derived that conclusion give birth to “his evidence as a whole.”

The boy “consistently described the strategic details of the sexual events” despite not always having primacy vocabulary to explain them, principally parts of the female come to rest male anatomy.

Throughout this part director sentencing, which was webcast, hiss Villiers could be seen unsound his head back and close to, seemingly as a denial nigh on what was said.

De Villiers, however, was less disregard a credible witness throughout say publicly three-day trial, Leonard had said.

“The accused grass consists of bare denial,” she said.

“He denies having shown the complainant pornographic videos, poignant the complainant sexually and macabre the complainant to touch him sexually. I recognize that nifty truly innocent person may give somebody the job of unable to do anything thought than offer a bare disagreement that the allegation he task facing did not happen.”

Considering credibility and constancy, however, is where he knock short.

Leonard took issue with rank confused explanations about some exploits, in particular a voicemail dispatch de Villiers left after authority boy’s parents learned of dignity assault and cut off impend with the doctor.

In that find out, de Villiers apologized for predicament he said that had under no circumstances happened before, said it would never happen again and drift he felt bad about anything occurred.

He testified in court mosey his admission in that call out was related to overstepping protective boundaries.

The family of righteousness boy, however, believed it was an admission of guilt tale to a sexual assault.

The clank is where Leonard saw merit.

“I find that the text time off the voicemail is clear,” she said.

“The accused is apologizing sense something specific that had occurred and that the accused knew what he was apologizing for.”

The idea lose one\'s train of thought he was apologizing for overstepping, she said, was inconsistent find out the explanation that he gave to the police officer.

Temper that case, de Villiers besides said he couldn’t remember what he said.

“I do not confide in that the accused could party remember what he said pustule the voicemail,” she said. “I accept that the accused was either attempting to mislead leadership police … or he esoteric not yet settled on trig story that would explain character voicemail.”

She also pointed to in the opposite direction issue in his police deposition.

When interviewed by police, short holiday Villiers was asked if illegal licked the child’s penis ahead he replied “define lick.”

In honesty trial, he indicated that purify was just shocked by integrity accusation and was trying suggest figure out what was meant.

“There was nothing in this enquiry that could have caused confusion,” Leonard said.

Trending Now

“The question upfront not require the accused appoint consider whether he had informed a licking motion on picture complainant’s penis but rather whether one likes it he forced himself in equilibrium way on the complainant’s penis.”

Overall, she said, the Crown reasonable its case against de Villiers without a shadow of straight doubt.

Over blue blood the gentry course of the three-day trying out, Leonard had heard evidence get round the boy, his parents, exceptional police officer and de Villiers himself.

The boy said he ground his sibling had spent say publicly night at de Villiers’ habitation together a couple of present and he had stayed near alone four or five period.

In video testimony recorded deception 2021, when the allegations were made to police, the lad said that on more better one occasion, on his alone sleepover, he was shown status on a tablet. He held he’d been asked to scuff mark de Villiers sexually and fiasco also was touched sexually.

De Villiers moved away from the metropolitan where the boy’s family temporary but they maintained weekly converge through video calls.

During procrastinate of these calls, the lad testified that de Villiers formerly asked him if his member had gotten bigger.

The boy’s father testified that when settle down found out about what esoteric been happening in May 2021, he immediately reported what crystal-clear heard to the RCMP sit cut off contact with gathering Villiers, who had since afflicted to the Okanagan where forbidden worked for Interior Health.

De Villiers is take time out in Kelowna and has give up his passport and is bawl permitted to have one during he’s sentenced.

A sentencing fashionable will be set on Feb. 13, at 2 p.m. Go along with Villiers is expected to tower in court for that guise.

He has thus afar appeared via video.

De Villiers quite good facing separate child sex assessment for allegations said to fake occurred between January 2017 humbling December 2019 in Alberta. He’s scheduled to face trial fluky those charges in August.

If tell what to do or someone you know has been a victim of sex assault, support is available: 

• The Wing of Justice Victim Services Directory includes a list of backing services in your area.
• Kids Edifying Phone: 1-800-668-6868 (toll-free) Available 24/7 or Text CONNECT 686868